Talk:Azimi Q models

Confused

At first I was so confused because I read this article and then found The Kjartansson constant Q model with almost the same info. My first question was what makes them differnt. In trying to figure this out I have come to a few conclusions:

1. No need for a basic section. It looks like basic was written like an abstract. The lead section should introduce the topic to a reader. The TOC will tell the reader the topics they will see and then the article's text itsself will tell the reader what they are reading.
2. The Kolsky model does not need its own section on every page. Instead, just have all the info on the one page. I would have named it "The Kolsky model" but I found that The Kolsky basic model and modified model for attenuation and dispersion was already written.

03:13, 25 May 2013‎ User:R00m c