Talk:Azimzhan Askarov

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Azimzhan Askarov/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: – Quadell ^(talk) 00:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Nominator: User:Khazar

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The prose is excellent.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	MoS adhered to.
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	References section is fine
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Very well sourced. In my spotchecks, all claims are backed up by their sources, and I detected no plagiarism.
	2c. it contains no original research.	Not a problem.
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	All issues resolved.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Not a problem.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	I think it's fine.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Not a problem.
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All issues resolved.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Not a problem.
	7. Overall assessment.	Congratulations.

Resolved issues

• 1b: Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lead section), the lede needs to summarize all sections of the article. The current three-sentence lead would be an excellent first paragraph, but about two more paragraphs need to be added that will summarize all sections.

• 1b: Although not necessary, I think an {{Infobox person}} would be useful, especially if a birthplace or birth year can be found.

• 2b: The information about HRW (at "Arrest and trial" and "International attention") is not sourced. The source is here.

• 3a: More information can and should be added. For instance, his 14 years of human rights work before his arrest is given only three sentences, but there is more info at People In Need and other sources. The sources also provide more information on "Imprisonment and health"; for instance his lawyer was threatened with violence if he continues to represent him, says this source. The "International attention" section is good, but People In Need quotes Askarov as saying "I cried like a baby. There are no words to express my heartfelt joy." when he received the Homo Hominy award, which would be a nice addition in my opinion (not a requirement).

• 6a: There are two photos that are not freely licensed, and they have a couple problems. For one thing, Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria states "Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information." In practice, this has been interpreted to mean that it is almost never acceptable to have two non-free photos of a person in a biography. You'll have to choose one, I'm afraid. Also, there are problems with the sourcing. Both images have a "source" listed which is just a bare URL to where the image is displayed elsewhere on the web; there is no information about the photographer, copyright holder, or date of the photograph. After digging a little, I found that the "bruises" photo is here sourced to Nurbek Toktakunov, his lawyer, and was taken June 22, 2010. So if you choose to use this image, I think it will be fine. I can't find any reliable information about the other image.

Death toll of June events

There seems to be an error in the death toll in regards to the June 2010 events in the South of Kyrgyzstan. Please note that around 2,000 people were injured and an estimated 400-900 people killed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_South_Kyrgyzstan_ethnic_clashes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.201.189.64 (talk) 04:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

article title

I've returned the article to the spelling "Askarov" for now, per WP:COMMONNAME as this is far more common on both Google and Google News. I'm happy to discuss a move if there's something I'm missing here, though. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 18:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

I've also reverted the spellings in the article, which were done in unfortunately haphazard fashion--some changed, others not, and in one case the title of a reference was changed to another spelling. Again, I'm happy to discuss alternate spellings, but let's make sure we don't switch back and forth throughout the article. -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:30, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Image

OTRS received an image which may be suitable for this article, but I will let the editors decide.

Azimzhan Askarov

--SPhilbrick(Talk) 00:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Will add--thanks! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:26, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Azimzhan Askarov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iphronline.org/kyrgyzstan_askarov_20100916_e.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120310063020/http://www.clovekvtisni.cz/index2en.php?id=548 to http://www.clovekvtisni.cz/index2en.php?id=548
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110808183529/http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/EUR58/005/2010/en/a875ff0a-6cce-4741-9ad8-4d7ab48d57ce/eur580052010en.html to http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/EUR58/005/2010/en/a875ff0a-6cce-4741-9ad8-4d7ab48d57ce/eur580052010en.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://cpj.org/awards/2012/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://freedomhouse.kg/home/186-video-o-azimzhane-askarove-pravozashchitnike-otbyvayushchego-pozhiznennoe-zaklyuchenie-v-kyrgyzstane

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Nationality or Ethnicity

"During the 2010 South Kyrgyzstan ethnic clashes, which primarily targeted people of the Uzbek nationality, Askarov worked to document the violence."

This sentence in the introduction mentions Uzbek nationality referring to one of the groups involved in the Kygyzstan ethnic clashes. While the word nationality has a historic use of meaning ethnicity, in a modern sence these two are quite distinct. If the ethnic clashes targeted citizens of the nation of Uzbekistan living in Kyrgyzstan, this would be correct. If they targeted the ethnic Uzbeks living in Kyrgyzstan, ethnicity would be more appropriate.

As I'm not too certain and this page has recently received a large ammount of descent edits I'm putting this question here in stead of just editing it. Dondville (talk) 05:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC)