Talk:BBC Radio 5 (former)

Fair use rationale for Image:Radio 5 1990.png

Image:Radio 5 1990.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

alleged closure

The station didn't close. It was relaunched. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 17:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

I disagree. The final night of programming was clearly billed at the time as "Radio 5's last night", Five Live was launched as a completely new service, and all of the non-sport programmes were new. Just because it uses the same frequency and has a similar name doesn't make it the same station.

Jacko1972 (talk) 06:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

They may have called it the last night but it remained a talk station with a regrettable blokish, sporting bias. It would be just as absurd to have a new W'pedia page every time a station got a new letterhead and jingle-package. Sensibly, material about BBC7 and 4extra is on the same page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.126.135.180 (talk) 17:40, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

But on the other hand, the Home Service and Radio 4 have separate pages despite actually being the same station. I think precedent suggests leaving things as they are. Jacko1972 (talk) 14:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

John Peel...

...had a show on this station, but I can't find any refs. Pollythewasp (talk) 21:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

14th December 2014 edit

I'm not sure I understand the rationale for this edit, it just seems to be someone's personal style preference. Personally I liked it better the way it read before. Any thoughts? Jacko1972 (talk) 15:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BBC Radio 5 (former). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100825175208/http://www.transdiffusion.org:80/rmc/features/launches2.php to http://www.transdiffusion.org/rmc/features/launches2.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 23 October 2016 (UTC)