Talk:BM-14

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 85.48.66.168 in topic Is the B-14-S designation factual?

Untitled

edit

This stub needs to be amalgamted with the Katyusha rocket launcher article, as it is limitedf in scope and the Katyusha article would cover the Katyusha series of rocket launchers more than adequately!!Petebutt (talk) 11:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I disagree. The current Katyusha rocket launcher article has no specific information about the BM-14, mentioning the term only once. Phoib (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BM-14. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BM-14. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BM-14. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Is the B-14-S designation factual?

edit

The Russian version of this article agrees with the designations for the B-14-O(fragmentation)F(high-explosive) and B-14-D(smoke) warheads, but doesn't mention a warhead with a B-14-S(illuminating) designation, as a sarin warhead would be designated — not B-14-Z(sarin) — but B-14-X(chemical) in Russian. As such, and absent any evidence to the contrary, it seems highly unlikely that any B-14 sarin warhead has ever borne this designation. Should this be indicated in the article somehow? 85.48.66.168 (talk) 22:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply