Talk:BRS/Search

Merge?

A much shortened version of this article would appear compatible with a merge to Open Text. --Stormbay 02:42, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

No. I would like this to stay separate from Open Text and be expanded and cleaned up (I think parts that are in the recent time frame since Open Text own it can be transferred though) I am interested in expanding the Enterprise Search article (currently it is just a list) with a history/timeline section and this BRS/SEARCH article is a good example of an early (Pre-WWW) system that can be referred to. As an encyclopedia I think it is important that we attempt to preserve historic content rather than destroy it. I'm willing to work on this page as well as any other early examples e.g BASIS, Fulcrum, InfoSphere etc. Ray3055 (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

That's great! I will take it off my watch list. Next time you improve it, you could remove the appropriate tags (i.e. notability and merge). I endorse expansion but this article had been dormant, basically, which is why I proposed the merge. --Stormbay (talk) 23:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I have temporarily commented out most of the original text which relates to Open Text history rather than BRS. The Jan Egeland article will provide much of the BRS early history and I'll rewrite as soon as I get time. Some of the Open Text timeline text could perhaps be useful on the Open Text page. I'll remove the merge and notability notice Ray3055 (talk) 11:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Re-write

I have re written the original page based on the references shown; no doubt there may be errors and there is much to clean up and expand. I have left some of the original Open Text history text as 'commented out' text in case anyone wants to use it to expand the Open Text page. There is still plenty of scope for expansion about the actual software technology... Ray3055 (talk) 23:03, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on BRS/Search. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070504100332/http://www.opentext.com:80/2/sol-products/sol-pro-knowledge-management/pro-ll-discovery-server.htm to http://www.opentext.com/2/sol-products/sol-pro-knowledge-management/pro-ll-discovery-server.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110811042724/http://www.opentext.com:80/2/global/products/products-knowledge-management/products-opentext-discovery-server-km.htm to http://www.opentext.com/2/global/products/products-knowledge-management/products-opentext-discovery-server-km.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070429055259/http://www.opentext.com:80/2/sol-products/pro-allproducts/pro-rebranded-products-table.htm to http://www.opentext.com/2/sol-products/pro-allproducts/pro-rebranded-products-table.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Commented-out text

Not sure if this wants to be adapted to be suitable for publication, or if it should just be deleted, but it was in the article, commented out. -- Beland (talk) 10:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

1995

1995 - Byte article says in dev since 12 yrs (1983) Dataware http://www.byte.com/art/9505/sec8/art3.htm

1996

Dataware introduce Visual basic toolikt for --- http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_1996_Dec_16/ai_18953315

(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 1, 1996—Dataware Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: DWTI) announces the acquisition of Status/IQ Limited, based in Abingdon, near Oxford, UK. Status/IQ specializes in the development of client/server software used to manage and deliver sophisticated databases containing large amounts of text and graphics. The acquisition creates the largest UK software and services company for text management and retrieval applications.

In a purchase transaction, Dataware will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Status/IQ from private investors in exchange for approximately $1,200,000 (including acquisition-related expenses) consisting of cash, common stock, and warrants to purchase additional common stock of Dataware Technologies. Status/IQ recorded $2.3 million in revenue in 1995.