Talk:Baby I

Baby I has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 13, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 5, 2017.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ariana Grande said she wanted her "Baby I" music video to emulate the "breeziness" of early 1990s music videos by TLC and Will Smith?

Ariana Grande Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ariana Grande, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ariana Grande on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ariana GrandeWikipedia:WikiProject Ariana GrandeTemplate:WikiProject Ariana GrandeAriana Grande articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Women in Music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Genre

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I do not understand why you guys say that the song is pop, if it is completely R & B, you guys have not heard it, here is the link to youtube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJuWlMFToNo, the real genre is important for the song, you can see that in all the pages and sources very well it says that it is R & B, are you guys trying to deny her sound? forgive me , but only a hater would say that the song is POP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.101.10.224 (talk) 22:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Album title

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Have we got reliable sources yet for the punctuation of the album title? —C.Fred (talk) 21:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Looking at what's in the article, it's contradictory. Digital Spy uses the comma; Fuse does not. —C.Fred (talk) 21:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

WP:SYN

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

We do not have a reliable source which generalized about the reviews received by this song. - SummerPhD^v2.0 20:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Per WP:BRD: Under this IP, you Boldly added the claim. You were Reverted. At that point, it was time to Discuss the edit before restoring it. Instead, you restored it. Another editor reverted you. Rather than discuss it, you restored it again. If needed, I can have this article semi-protected as well.

I do not see a source stating it received acclaim from music critics. I see a small number of reviews that you have decided are "acclaim" and have combined to make the claim not stated by any of the individual sources. - SummerPhD^v2.0 14:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baby I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.fdr.com.ua/compilation/P/598/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic