Talk:Backlash (sociology)
 | This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 30 June 2019. Further details are available here. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 April 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
9 October 2006
editThe list in this article is totally haphazard. It should get a disambiguation page for some of it, and the rest should be canned, due to irrelevance or red links of arbitrary wording. Amber388 18:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
IP editor desiring changes
editTo IP editor: If you can provide reliable sources for your preferred version that will work better than what is there--WHICH HAS NO SOURCES AT ALL. Google scholar is an easy free way to find good sources: [1]. --David Tornheim (talk) 13:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Respectfully, I feel like you are making this a big deal when it is not. The previous version did not have any citations, so the admonishment in this regard is also applicable to the original version (and the attempted reversion). Second, this is not an edit "war;" if you believe that the previous version, written at a high school level, consisted of better grammar and sentence structure, please feel free to revert back. Similarly, please feel free to find your own scholarly sources and add your own contributions rather than trying to moderate a "war" that does not exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:249:8300:593C:748B:BF6D:BEDE:6E34 (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- I already replied to you on your talk page: User talk:2601:249:8300:593C:748B:BF6D:BEDE:6E34 --David Tornheim (talk) 13:18, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- I was hoping you would add WP:RS. I added numerous articles from Google Scholar--as I had suggested above. I'm not sure they are what you want... If you think there is something better, please feel free to put it in instead. --David Tornheim (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
References
editIn the talk section immediately above, I had suggested adding WP:RS to this article to an editor who wanted changes. Months have gone by and there was still no WP:RS. I used Google Scholar to add items that came up for sociology and backlash. I'm not sure they are the best. I very much welcome better WP:RS. I figured it would be better to have less than perfect RS than none at all.
I changed the tags to reflect that there is now WP:RS, but that better WP:RS might be available. --David Tornheim (talk) 05:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)