Talk:Badblocks
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
used for data destruction
editan organization i volunteer with[computer recycler] uses this program to erase donated hard disk drives and test the integrity at the same time. i believe they make four passes, and it works by writing to a sector, then reading back the sector and listening for change. any errors abouve a certain threshold are failed and torn apart for physical destruction...if any more expirenced editors care to add something about this procedure in 99bluefoxx (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
disambiguation?
editshouldn't there be a disambiguation page mentiong that "badblocks" may also refer to the actual badblocks and not just some program used in a certain OS to deal with them? --TiagoTiago (talk) 12:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- No, because the bad blocks to which you are referring are actually bad sectors. You could, however, link to that article if it isn't linked in this article already.--86.8.252.7 (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
badblocks need to be updated
edit1. The number of blocks tested at one time is very small (only 64K) If you increase this to a MB at a time with -c 1024, you can almost double the speed of the badblocks utility.
2. badblocks can't handle disks over 2TB in size.
Wikipedia should mention that.--71.194.190.179 (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- The 2TB limit is simply the product of
- 512-byte sectors
- 32-bit block numbers
- Both of these have been resolved in later versions of fsutils.
- Martin Kealey (talk) 02:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Badblocks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120719000028/http://www.ukdatarecovery.com/articles/bad-sector-remapping.html to http://www.ukdatarecovery.com/articles/bad-sector-remapping.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Isn't it a GNU utility?
editThe lead says that it's a Linux utility. Isn't it actually a GNU utility? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 01:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)