Talk:Bagman (Better Call Saul)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Bilorv in topic GA Review
 | Bagman (Better Call Saul) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 12, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Bagman (Better Call Saul)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Bilorv (talk · contribs) 02:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
At the Emmys
– More formal and clear isAt the Primetime Emmy Awards
.
- Why the Variety citation in the plot? If the sentence isn't clear from watching the episode alone then rewrite so that we only present such information (and then analysis / writer intention can come later). I also can't see what Variety is actually verifying of that paragraph.
Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
and immediately depart
can be omitted (sentence would still imply that without that bit).
only truck that is still drivable
is more concise asonly remaining drivable truck
(could even drop "remaining").
As they camp overnight ...
took me a couple of tries to parse due to the complex comma usage: I'd prefer a semicolon so it goes... his work for Lalo; Mike warns ...
- Is it worth mentioning something about Mike and Jimmy's physical condition (the latter in particular) or the water situation? I know a plot summary can't communicate this in full but to me the episode is strikingly memorable because of the extreme physical effects on Jimmy and the precarity of their lives just by having to trek so far in those conditions.
- I'll let you off with 404 words against a 400 word limit but make sure after any changes it's not far over (or ideally over at all).
- Done Got it to 400 words. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Gilligan had been able to make arrangements to direct one episode
– less clunky asGilligan had made arrangements to direct one episode
.
continually teased Gilligan in the weeks leading up before the episode's filming that it was going to be well-suited for him
– Perhapscontinually teased Gilligan that the episode was well-suited for him in the weeks prior to filming
?
Gilligan credits his production team ...
– Past tense when quoting an interview, "credited".
Gilligan wanted Bob Odenkirk to employ method acting techniques, and did supply him with weighed bags to tote, but Odenkirk had drawn the line at drinking urine
– Is this not a joke?I wanted Bob to be method and drink his own pee. He’s pretty method, but he drew the line at that.
I'm not sure how serious this bit is. But the weighted bags of a bit less than the 150 lbs they thought it would actually weigh is a good thing to highlight.
... other American "original cable telecasts" that aired ...
– My #1 pet peeve is the frequent "quote from nowhere". Without the quotes is fine, unless it needs to be a direct quote, in which case say in prose which organization you are quoting.
- Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I would put IndieWire and Den of Geek in italics here as in this context they're publications, rather than companies.
- Rowspans are needed in the accolades table for accessibility reasons as here (ideally a caption too, and you can use {{sronly}} on it so that it only appears to users with screen readers).
- Image shouldn't used fixed pixels, I think, in case a reader's screen varies wildly in size from your screen. You can use
uprightif it needs to differ from the default size. Alt text would be nice, too.
with many calling it one of the best episodes of the series
– Which reviewers specifically? Probably worth citing inline (in the body), possibly bundled as a note if it's more than three.
- I'd like a bit of a meatier "Critical response" section—for instance, is one comparison to another work all you can get from the Rolling Stone review? We've got a good amount of content about directing and visual style, but I'm left wanting more detail on what reviewers said about the characterization, acting, plot, maybe soundtrack even. GamesRadar+ is a source that looks very nice to me that could be worth adding.
No stability, neutrality or copyvio issues; for broadness and focus the article follows a very established episode article format well. My favorite Better Call Saul episode (... so far) so good to see it getting the attention it deserves! — Bilorv (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Bilorv: All done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- The image still specifies
272x272px
. Also:... did supply him with bags to tote weighing 75 pounds each
– The source doesn't say this; rather,Bob wanted them pretty heavy, but not that heavy.
— Bilorv (talk) 02:36, 12 March 2021 (UTC)- @Bilorv: Image, only with the text, have been fixed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, well I think more could be done in the future to expand "Reception" even further, but we're definitely over the line for GA now, so it's a
pass for GA from me. I appreciate the fast fixes. — Bilorv (talk) 11:03, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Alright, well I think more could be done in the future to expand "Reception" even further, but we're definitely over the line for GA now, so it's a
- @Bilorv: Image, only with the text, have been fixed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 03:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- The image still specifies
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.