Talk:Bahrain Tamarod/GA1

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

1. Beautiful work on this article, which firmly meets GA standards and could likely pass FA with minimal changes. Comprehensive, well written, excellent effort at representing multiple sides of the topic. You're a powerhouse when it comes to Bahrain articles and WP is lucky to have you. Cheers, Lemurbaby (talk) 11:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC)