Talk:Baldwin (abbot of Bury St Edmunds)/GA2
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs)
Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Lead
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- A pithy summary of the article.
Early life
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- Clear and concise
Abbot
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- A pithy summary of Baldwin's time as Abbot.
After the Conquest
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- An interesting history; concise and well written.
Death and legacy
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- A good explanation of Baldwin promoting the cult of the Holy Face of Lucca, and the Cult of St Edmund.
Citations
edit- Noted
References
edit- Examined.
End Matter
editIs it is Broad in its coverage?
edit- Is it reasonably well written?
- This article is a pithy account of the life and works of Baldwin as Abbot and Doctor to varia Kings. He protected Bury St Edmunds from diocesan bishops by leave / appeal to the Papacy.
More End Matter Stuff:
edit- Does it follow the neutral point of view policy?
- Yes
- Is it stable?
- Yes, very few edits to what is a complete account of Baldwin as Abbot. This page was created on 22 January 2016 and has received 86 edits since then.
- Top editors are
* Ealdgyth * Ehrenkater * Srnec * Hugo999
- It is illustrated by images ?
- No, however, search does not bring up images of Baldwin (abbot of Bury St Edmunds) - so, accepted.
Overall
edit- A neat article, well referenced. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2021 (UTC)