 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Merge
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
- Support: This article covers two separate topics: the concept of a single-engine tiltrotor, which should be merged to the Tiltrotor article, and an article specifically about the Bell-Textron MTR project. -Aubri (talk) 17:36, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- Partial oppose: Copy/split general monorotor info to tiltrotor and rename this article Mono tiltrotor project or something similar. -Fnlayson (talk) 07:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support - merge general topic of single rotor to tilt rotor and rearrange the rest to cover this specific instance of a mono tilt-rotor with appropriate name change for article. GraemeLeggett (talk) 08:46, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support - both articles are moderately short. I support merging them but keeping the mono-tiltrotor as a separate section or "special case" of the general category. - Ahunt (talk) 13:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- I moved the general MTR overview text to Tiltrotor, since everybody is in agreement on that. I left the part about the MTR program here for now. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Good work. It just needs de-jargonifying into plain English now. GraemeLeggett (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Any other general text left to merge to tiltrotor? If not I'll close this discussion out with {{Discussion top}} & {{Discussion bottom}} templates. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:49, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Good work. It just needs de-jargonifying into plain English now. GraemeLeggett (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.