Talk:Ballast Island (Japan)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 19:23, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

• Pretty short article; I get that there isn't much coverage of it, but after some digging I found some sources covering snorkeling in the region (1), and some scientific papers that mention some of the fish found there (1, 2, 3, 4). Two of these fish have holotypes or lectotypes from the island, so they definitely seem worth mentioning.
  • Added these to the article. -G
• "gravely composition" Think this is supposed to be "gravelly".
  • Fixed. - G
• What's settlement dispersal?
  • Sediment, my bad. - G
• "a size it has largely remained since" sounds weird, maybe "remaining around this size since"?
  • Good change, fixed. - G
• Images are fine. Spot-checked both the English-language sources, AGF-ing on the Japanese one for obvious reasons.
• That's all. AryKun (talk) 14:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

@AryKun: Made changes per your recommendations, thank you so much! Generalissima (talk) 17:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed