Talk:Banbury (UK Parliament constituency)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banbury (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101106204053/http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk:80/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm to http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

2015 constituency size no longer relevant

@2a02:c7c:da23:cc00:75df:3b45:8ff1:2eb Sorry I didn't get what your edit reason was referring to at first. The reason information about the size of the constituency at the 2015 general election is no longer relevant is, well, quite apart from the fact that 2015 was almost a decade ago and there have been three general elections since then (really that piece of info should have been replaced after the 2017 general election with updated info if it was available), the boundary changes in 2024 significantly reduced the size of the constituency making information about the size of the pre-2024 constituency no longer relevant to the current constituency.

As the boundary changes were intended to make all 645 constituencies that weren't on the small list of "protected" constituency is of very similar size, there is no point in mentioning the relative size of any of these constituencies any more. If this sort of information about the size of the pre-2024 constituency is to be mentioned at all, it should be in a later section of the article, not the lead. There is maybe a case for mentioning how oversize the constituency was prior to the 2024 election and the fact that the 2024 boundary changes significantly reduced its size, but I'm not quite sure where that information should go. Apologies again for not getting your meaning at first. Offa29 (talk) 12:14, 2 August 2024 (UTC)