Talk:Banbury United F.C.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Banbury United F.C. article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
A note on British English
editBritish English should be used for articles on Britain related topics. Likewise, American English should be used on articles pertaining to American topics. For a clearer example, please visit this sub-section on the differences between their usage. --Siva1979Talk to me 03:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete - contested
editA reasonable sized football club in UK terms, let alone in Oxfordshire where they are the second largest team. Always feared in the FA Cup, there are smaller/less significant teams with existing wikipedia records that have never been contested. I won't contest that its presently poorly written, but they are significant enough for an article. Rgds, - Trident13 15:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
This article is more than worthy of a page. Every club at this level and many at much lower levels have articles. This is one of the larger articles, and I am planning to rewrite most of it in the next few days. --geniussansom 17:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep them in
editI have seen another local team already get the boot from Wikipedia for similar reasons! Keep them in, its a big club with a good following. Other non notiable teams are listed here.
Player Info
editIm trying to add a stub about some of the players but they get deleted!! why!!!! everyone wants to know about prewvious teams etc! Keeeeep them in!!!! Kizybit 17:21, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Banbury logo.gif
edit
File:Banbury logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
