Talk:Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria

Suspicion of Copyright Infringement

I suspect most of the content of this article were lifted out from the History Section of the English website of BBVA. [1] Sections "History", "Expansion" and "The Creation of BBVA" corresponds to the subpages of the same name in that section well.

Of course, if this is under the permission from BBVA itself, I won't object. --Samuel Curtis-- TALK 14:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Integrate material on Judge Garzon

The investigating magistrate Baltasar Garzón rather fanously investigated BBVA's involvement in money laundering a few years back. It's in the Garzon article, but not this one. It ought to be referenced here, which by itself would help make this something other than a PR piece. --Christofurio 20:25, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:BBVA Compass Logo.jpg

The image File:BBVA Compass Logo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 13 June 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved  — Amakuru (talk) 11:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

---

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria → BBVA – Similarly to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration not being called "National Aeronautics and Space Administration", BBVA is hardly known as "Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria" (even the bank refers to itself this way). The acronym generates more results than the formal name, a [2] tendency that began after Banco Bilbao Vizcaya and Argentaria merged in 1999. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 00:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC)--Relisted. – Ammarpad (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

• Oppose BBVA means nothing to me or most outside Spin. Acronym titles should generally be avoided; of course redirects are fine. I note that it is only this year that a host of local brand names in the US and other countries have been swept away and replaced by BBVA, so in a year or two this might make more sense. Johnbod (talk) 21:34, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

@Johnbod:, refer to WP:ACRONYMTITLE before you assert that acronyms are avoided. Furthermore, the US brand changed recently, but BBVA has been doing this change for 20 years now. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 17:34, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Also, per WP:ACRONYMTITLE, you need to prove Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria is the WP:COMMONAME. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 17:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

• Support per nom. The proposed title also meets WP:CRITERIA. Calidum 04:09, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
• Oppose I was looking to see if I could close some cases in the backlog, and this one was tough, since after relisting it only had one support and one oppose. So I dug in and decided to express an opinion instead. I think it's not the case that "the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation" since I see the full name mentioned in lot of recent sources still. And I reject Tbhotch's claim that the opposer has to prove that the current title is the commonname. It's up to nom to make a better case. The n-gram stats showing that the acronym is much more common is not sufficient, by analogy with the CIA n-grams as discussed at WP:ACRONYMTITLE. Dicklyon (talk) 05:34, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

@Dicklyon: Can you include those, and I cite, "lots of recent [English] sources using the full name mentioned". I'm curious about it as I highly doubt English speakers use the legal name rather than the easily written and pronouned /Be Be Ve Ei/. And yes, it is my job to "prove that the current title is the commonname", but when opposers merely oppose, leave and never attempt to reply, what am I supposed to prove? Tbsock (Tbhotch away) (talk) 18:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Sure. News, Books. Dicklyon (talk) 03:13, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

• Leaning oppose, as this falls short of being the sort of household name status that a NASA or NATO has reached. bd2412 T 22:09, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Yet HSBC is valid. Yeah, English-centric website. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 02:46, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Well, yes we are; I see from your user page that you're from Mexico, so I can understand that this one might be familiar to you. To most English speakers, I think BBVA will be unknown. So will the full name, but at least "Banco ..." makes it recognizable as a bank name. English language sources seem to assume that BBVA will be unfamiliar, so they use the full name, at least the first time in introducing the acronym. Dicklyon (talk) 04:41, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

add Liga BBVA (former name of La Liga) and Liga BBVA MX

Add please, didn't mention in article 43.224.39.177 (talk) 12:40, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Please reply 43.224.38.120 (talk) 23:45, 11 June 2024 (UTC)