Talk:Banded bullfrog/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by GhostRiver in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:33, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede

edit
  • No comma needed after "dark brown back"  Y
  • "low altitudes"  Y
  • Where is it a potential invasive species?  Y

Taxonomy and etymology

edit
  • Good

Description

edit
  • Why are the gram weights not converted into imperial units, but all the length measurements are?  Y

Distribution and habitat

edit
  • Good

As an invasive species

edit
  • Both the invasive population is under control and no established invasive population has been found need "as of" qualifiers, as those statements are liable to change.  Y
      Working on this one a bit more – a helpful IP editor has actioned the other suggestions so far. Thanks for the initial comments! DanCherek (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
    Alright, added another source for the Florida part, and "as of" has been added! DanCherek (talk) 00:36, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Behaviour and ecology

edit

Diet, predators, and parasites

edit

Pet trade

edit

Status and threats

edit

References

edit
  • Looks good

General comments

edit
  • Images are properly licensed and obviously relevant
  • No stability concerns in revision history
  • Earwig score looks good

Thank you for your patience; I have been working through several health issues both physical and mental. Putting on hold now. — GhostRiver 17:44, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks GhostRiver, and no problem at all. I hope you feel better on all fronts soon. Responded to each point above, let me know if you see any other issues! DanCherek (talk) 18:45, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for making those changes, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 16:36, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply