Talk:Bangerz/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever (talk · contribs) 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC) Hi, I'm Gonna. I forgot to create this page as I read this Bangerz article, but I did so after reading it. This is my sixth GAN review.

Here are the issues I find in this article:

• No references in the lead (if any).
• The entirety of this article (especially tone, grammar, and prose) needs a copyedit from the Guild of Copy Editors (GoCE).
• It reads like a biased news article.
• Please don't rely heavily on primary sources.
• "Legacy" is unnecessary.
• I see incomplete references.
• Sometimes the article has incorrect formatting.

The result is just a quickfail. Mr*|(60nna) 00:19, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Comment – Being on a non-biased observer of this article, it seems like this may need a second opinion, for numerous reasons:

• A) A lead is NEVER to have references in it, which should come as basic knowledge to every Wikipedia editor
• B) The article is well written, only simple errors that can be addressed in the GA review itself.
• C) The "Legacy" is non-existent, unless you are referring to the "Impact" section, in which is well sourced and justifiable.

A quick fail on this seems unreasonable, so I would suggest re nominating this for a second opinion. Giacobbe ^talk 00:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)