Talk:Bangui/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Smarojit (talk · contribs) 12:05, 28 July 2013 (UTC) I shall review this article. --smarojit HD 12:05, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | References 10 and 11 are dead (I have marked them using Checklinks)
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
--smarojit HD 15:52, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Additional comment: Any reason why the three sentences on health care are provided in the "economy" section? --smarojit HD 16:04, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
- Shifted to a separate section on Health.
- Dr.Blofeld and myself were involved in the DYK. I also edited and enlarged the bibliography section and corrected some other sections before it was posted on GA. I have replied to all the observations. I hope it is ok now.--Nvvchar. 23:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Comment: Please ensure that there aren't any instances of overlinking in the prose. Currently, there are several such instances. Also, the third and fourth mention of "AIDS" has been wikilinked, while the first one hasn't been. So please link only the first occurrence of the word. --smarojit HD 02:19, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Hopefully, I have removed extra links and addressed all other issues.--Nvvchar. 04:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Will come back later in the day after finding new sources for the dead links.--Nvvchar. 15:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Addressed all other issues raised by you.--Nvvchar. 19:28, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Good job. I am passing the article. :) --smarojit HD 05:31, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments from other users
editCitations 31, 32, 55, and 56 do not work.--Gilderien Talk|List of good deeds 23:58, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
- All the references are given in the bibliography and one reference is added in the main text. --Nvvchar. 23:18, 30 July 2013 (UTC)