Hi Sagotreespirit, there are now numerous secondary sources from Stuff, BusinessInsider, ITWeb, Moneyweb, Forbes, BusinessLIVE, and BusinessTech. Is this sufficient to remove the {{notability}} tag? I know there are a few citations from Bank Zero's press statements, but that information couldn't be found elsewhere. TIA, comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 09:23, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
- @Waddie96: Take a look at Wikipedia:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. Notability is not the same as not having enough references. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
- @Sagotreespirit: yes, but if the refs (not necessarily the new additions) meet "significant coverage in: multiple, independent, reliable, secondary sources"? (I added new refs to decrease the reliance on the self-published press releases, and increase "multiple".) comrade waddie96 ★ (talk) 09:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
- You can remove the notability tag yourself whenever you feel the article is ready. Keep WP:TOOSOON in mind. I would still say that notability is questionable, but I'll leave this for other editors to decide. — Sagotreespirit (talk) 09:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
