Talk:Bank of England 10 shilling note

2019 inflation calculator

Interesting... according to the BoE inflation calculator when brought into circulation in 1929 the 10 shilling note was worth the equivalent of £32 in 2019 money... When the note was phased out in 1969 it was worth £8.25 in 2019 money. Perhaps this could be included in the article. So it's about time the £10 note became a coin! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.46.73 (talk) 19:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• 10 Sh 1940 E.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:36, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 5 February 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Rough consensus not to move. Some support for moving articles like Bank of England £5 note but a new discussion would be required. (non-admin closure) BilledMammal (talk) 14:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

---

Bank of England 10 shilling note → ? – The stable title was long "...10s note" until TheCurrencyGuy moved it without prior discussion. Their rationale was: "s" as the abbreviation for the 10 shilling note was rarer than "/–", have compromised between the two by using the full word.

However, this means that this page's title is inconsistent with page titles such as Bank of England £5 note, where "...£5 note" with the pound sign is used instead of "...5 pound note". Therefore, I would like to ask whether we should move the page to "...10/- note" to match TCG's usual abbreviation for the shilling, or to the title of "...10s note". NotReallySoroka (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

• Comment this is a broader thing but there's an inconsistency with the Banknotes of the Australian pound (the only other series of British-origin banknotes where each note has its own article), which use the titling "ten-shilling note", "one-pound note" etc.. It can be easily chalked up to differences between Australian and British style but still worth considering. (Also, can the article actually be moved to "...10/- note"? Wouldn't that cause technical issues?) Bayonet-lightbulb (talk) 11:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

  It is technically possible to move it to "... 10/- note" since subpages are dormant in the main namespace. However, it would make the talk page into the subpage of the nonexistent "Bank of England 10". NotReallySoroka (talk) 22:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Weak support "... 10s note" as nominator simply because it is the stable title. I should be able to opine this because I didn't express a preference to either choice in my nomination statement. Thanks. NotReallySoroka (talk) 22:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

I would also recommend that the page use "10s" instead of "10/-" to match its would-be title. NotReallySoroka (talk) 22:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

• Oppose, those abbreviations are really unsightly and unencyclopedic. I suppose we could make that "10-shilling" or "ten-shilling", but the "stable title" is not an improvement. No such user (talk) 12:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
• Opppose per No such user. We should probably also remove the pound sign from articles like Bank of England £5 note. Vpab15 (talk) 14:45, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.