Talk:Banksia acanthopoda/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Visionholder in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Review and comments forthcoming...

Reviewer: – VisionHolder « talk » 15:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Pass: I made a few small changes, most notably by using the Convert template. (I did notice an error in the handling of sigfigs when dealing with temps, but I have reported it to the template's talk page, and it should be fixed soon.) I used the template to ensure MoS was followed in regards to non-breaking spaces, which were not consistent on the page prior to the edit. All-in-all, it is well-written, thorough (given our current understanding of the plant), and appears to meet all MoS requirements.

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Good job! – VisionHolder « talk » 16:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply