Talk:Banque cantonale de Genève
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Removed claim that BCGE is "one of the largest cantonal banks"
editAccording to this report [1], BCGE ranks 12th out of 24 cantonal banks. That's median size, and doesn't warrant the claim that BCGE is "one of the largest cantonal banks".
Perhaps there are better sources that do support this claim. If so, they should be cited in the article. 2620:0:105F:3:6D8A:CE29:97B8:72A0 (talk) 14:23, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Banque cantonale de Genève. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011142600/http://www.bcge.ch/ihbp/bcge/pdf/apropos/publications/rapport05gb.pdf to http://www.bcge.ch/ihbp/bcge/pdf/apropos/publications/rapport05gb.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105090638/http://geneva.intl.ch:80/index.htm to http://geneva.intl.ch/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)