Talk:Banská Bystrica/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by SilkTork in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Doing a review as it appears there may be some issues, and there has been a request for a GAR since Sept 2013. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:56, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply


Tick box

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is clear and concise, without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  


Comments on GA criteria

edit
Pass
Query
Fail

General comments

edit

On hold

edit

There are sufficient concerns regarding the MoS issues to put the GA listing in jeopardy. While there are aspects of the GA criteria I've not yet fully looked into, I'm putting the review on hold for the standard initial seven days and notifying significant contributors, in order to allow work to start on addressing the concerns. Meanwhile I'll do some background reading to see if major aspects of the topic are covered, and to check out sourcing. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

No progress. WikiProjects informed. Unless someone objects, the article will be delisted in seven days. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:18, 4 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Delisting

edit

With several concerns regarding failing to meet GA criteria including sourcing concerns dating back to October 2012, and no editors showing an interest in helping out resolve the issues, I am delisting. When concerns have been addressed then the article can be renominated. SilkTork ✔Tea time 14:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply