Talk:Baorangia bicolor/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rcej (talk · contribs) 05:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello :) I hope you didn't mind that I went ahead and did a general copy edit of the article; its just sort of the way I review and its stuff I would've ordered you to fix anyway...lol. Big time saver there, for both of us. But, here is your 'to do' list:

• The name two-colored bolete is not hyphened here and there.
• Lets use the metric conversion templates. ;-)
• Macrochemical tests. hmm...tests with big chemicals?
• In similar species, how about we add this image of B. rubellus?

Thanks!! -- Rcej (Robert) – talk 10:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

I can get that done today.--Krustev LeMont (talk) 17:34, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

I have fixed the problems on your list. Thanks for keeping it simple.--Krustev LeMont (talk) 18:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

• Very good! Passimo ;) Rcej (Robert) – talk 09:15, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Results of review

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

The article Boletus bicolor passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass