Talk:Barachiel

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

[Untitled]

edit

This article should be longer--V7ndotcom elursrebmem 11:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's why there's a stub tag on it. Personally, I can't find much more to write about him though. TCC (talk) (contribs) 20:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Just a thought

edit

in this section

It has also been suggested that he may be identical to Baraqyal, who is occasionally mentioned as a fallen angel.

it should say who suggested it,is it the catholics or Jehovah's witnesses? and if so write it as such with a citation

in the section iconography is that a general term or is it iconography in catholicism or Buddhism etc just to be specific I am not sure on this.

in the section patronage defining his responsibilities according to which faith and culture, it should say this and have a citation and also praying to the angel is that catholic tradition or a general Christian tradition, not all people in Christianity would believe in this ideology so you should state where it stems from and provide a citation.

also aren't angels void of sex, I mean they are neither female or male?? if so why is the being referred to as Him??

I am not confident enough to edit this article myself but I had these questions in my mind when I read it, perhaps someone with experience on the subject along with the articles creator could take on board some of my suggestions. for the record I liked the article and it interested me as in the catholic sense I suppose this being would be my guardian angel.

Vinaka,Maikeli MB (talk) 00:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


What about...

edit

We add in the missing persons case found at http://francisfranco.wikia.com/ ? Dripping Blood (talk) 02:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Merge?

edit

With http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baraqiel 174.4.163.53 (talk) 16:12, 25 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barachiel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)Reply