Talk:Barbara Creed
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Untitled
editPotential sources to update with:
Working to update theory, filmography, and awards. Suggestions on places to find more biographical information as well are welcome.
Chaudhuri, Shohini. Feminist Film Theorists : Laura Mulvey, Kaja Silverman, Teresa De Lauretis, Barbara Creed. London ; New York: Routledge, 2006. Print. Routledge Critical Thinkers.
Grant, and Grant, Barry Keith. The Dread of Difference : Gender and the Horror Film. 1st ed. Austin: U of Texas, 1996. Print. Texas Film Studies Ser.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kathryn Wohlpart. Peer reviewers: Mhenkelman.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Please don't delete
editI created this page because it was an uncreated link from the Abjection entry. I believe her theories are incredibly valuable to researchers of horror, cinema and psychoanalysis. Researchers in those fields would probably like to know something about the author of the books they are using.
I am in the process of adding sources to verify her notability.
Peer Review
editVery good lead section, easy to understand, and establishes her importance well. The lead section also does a good job of framing the work to be explored. You might consider moving her accolades to another section (the Human Rights and Australian academy business), because with those two moved, the lead section frames the heavier content of your article. Your 'Work' Category is very well organized and flows nicely; starting with the definition of the monstrous feminine and then moving into each work that Barbara has written is a good move, we have the context necessary to understand what follows. I like that you have a shortened title for each work, but you might want to consider listing the full title of her essays within the text (leaving the headings abbreviated) so that we don't need to pan down to the notes section to discover that they are essays. You do a very excellent job of staying neutral in your presentation! I see that you have some more sources in your proposed bibliography and you might want to consider using a few so that all citations are not linked specifically to Barbara Creed; I think you'll run into issues with the article being biased (even in its neutral presentation) if the only person cited is Creed. Great work!Mhenkelman (talk) 15:48, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Mhenkelman
Thanks for the feedback! I definitely intend to update the bio section, that was written previous to my work so I wanted to see what ended up being in its own section. Thank you for the feedback, I will work on clarificaiton. Kathryn Wohlpart (talk) 21:02, 30 November 2016 (UTC)