This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Barberenachampsa is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dilkes and Arcucci (2012) as well as Langer et al. (2007) regard the name "Barberenachampsa" as a nomen nudum. Dilkes and Arcucci (2012) mentioned that name once: "P. nodosa has been placed in a new genus Barberenachampsa by Kischlat (2000), but the name is invalid because it was not formally introduced as a new taxon". Furthermore, any paper I know of, even Kischlat and Schultz (1999) treat P. nodosa as a species of Proterochampsa, so I think we should redirect "Barberenachampsa" page to Proterochampsa. If someone disagrees, please let me know... Rnnsh (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
