Talk:Barbonymus strigatus
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Removed things
editI removed some information that was not true and the references went to a page that was only very basic and conflicting. Pretty sure it isn't 300 feet long with 25 foot fangs. Dreambeaver (talk) 01:33, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barbonymus strigatus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131202225925/http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s27/rbz_S27.pdf to http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/biblio/s27/rbz_S27.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Maximum size dissonance
edithttps://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=10224939728615956&set=gm.1710003462530542
The image used in the article shows a fish that appears to be much larger than 16.8 cm, i would say around 35cm FSbiran (talk) 23:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)