Talk:Barcelona Euro-Mediterranean Conference
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
If you want more info on why I deleted the POV bits about Solana's supposedely having too much power read the debate here. --SqueakBox 22:16, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
from Vfd
editOn 11 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Barcelona Conference for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 02:05, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
Process Seems Alive
editI can't see deleting this article. According to reference 2, dated 23 Feb 2005, it forms the genesis of the European Neighbourhood Policy (for which there is as yet no article but I put up a request for one). In addition, it is referenced in the Trial against the Bulgarian medics and a Palestinian doctor in Libya. 216.164.138.57 20:46, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Euromed II
editI see that a follow-up conference has just been held, exactly a decade after the original. It would be useful if someone with knowledge of the issue could outline any new developments, and describe the differences with Euromed I Bastie 20:13, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
Merge
editI have proposed this page be merged with Euromediterranean Partnership as they both address the same topic. In addition Euromediterranean Summit 2005 and Euro-Mediterranian Assembly can be merged into the same topic as they are both basic, short, articles. I suggest it take the name Barcelona Process as that is the more common and broader name for this. -JLogan 18:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- I would support a merger, but think they should merge under Euromediterranean Partnership, as that is the official term. Also, keep Barcelona Conference (the 1995 one) as a short, separate stand-alone article. Nicolasdz 04:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
- Support merger of all 4 articles, preferably under the name Euromediterranean Partnership. I would also consider including Euro-Mediterranean free trade area. After improvement and expansion, it would be possible to split again if the combined article became too unwieldy. --Boson 22:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Also support all, no sence in splitting connected information, esp. as the articles are rather short. - J Logan t: 07:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
No More MEDA
editFunding for the EMP is now done through the ENPI and MEDA no longer exists as a funding instrument. I have removed references to it in the article. Nicolasdz 04:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)