Talk:Barentsburg

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2A02:8388:1600:A200:A271:DF4A:C9F9:37E5 in topic Recent blockade in 2022

Old talk

edit

The article says "coal mining has always been unprofitable" -- surely this isn't literally true or else the coal wouldn't be mined in the first place. Tlogmer 13:49, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's all relative. The Russians mine only a little coal, use many miners and support staff to do that, BUT the expenses are in roubles and the income is in Euro/Krona/Dollars. It's like sending tourists in orbit for only 20m dollars. The Russians will put prodigeous effort in getting very few dollars. Feel free to change the article, but if you put it as profitable, you should explain why. Cheers, Vincent 22:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

When, or in what year was this colony established? Dr. Dan 22:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Time zone incorrect?

edit

The infobox mentions a time zone of "CET(UTC+2)". I don't think this can possibly be correct. CET is UTC+1, not +2. So if I'm not mistaken it should either be UTC+2 (Kaliningrad time) or "CET (UTC+1)" (as is the rest of the archipelago). In the latter case, wouldn't that also mean that Russia actually has 12 time zones rather than 11 (as mentioned on Time in Russia, Time zones by country and Time zone#Additional_information)? Skysmurf (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

As Barentsburg is part of Norway, I would have though it followed the same time as the rest of the archipelago. As for the number of time zones in Russia, remember that Barentsburg is a Russian settlement in Norway. Norwegian law applies (the limited amount of law that applies on Svalbard), but Norwegian authorities cannot deny Russia (or any other country) from establishing a settlement on the archipelago. So Russia still has 11 zones, since Barentsburg isn't part of Russia. Arsenikk (talk) 21:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for clearing up the Norway-Russia issue. Now, all that's left is figuring out whether whoever wrote "CET (UTC+2)" meant CET (=UTC+1) or UTC+2. The former seems much more plausible, but so far I haven't been able to find a good source. Skysmurf (talk) 21:54, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Barentsburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Barentsburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Recent blockade in 2022

edit

The recent blocked should be mentioned in the article:

Example: https://www.euronews.com/2022/07/06/russia-and-norway-agree-to-resolve-svalbard-transit-dispute

This is also interesting in HOW goods are delivered. Perhaps someone who knows can extend the article and add more images from the area. That way we people who were never there understand the dilemma a bit better. 2A02:8388:1600:A200:A271:DF4A:C9F9:37E5 (talk) 19:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply