Section "Bariatrics Patients" reads as argumentative

edit

The section labeled Bariatrics Patients reads like a sales pitch for bariatric treatment. Clearer labeling would be "Arguments for Bariatric Treatment," but it is arguably outside the proper scope of a Wikipedia article to present arguments for or against the subject of the article.

Anti-Americanism

edit

The Respect makes you fatter comment appears to be vitriol towards obese persons and Americans (unclear whether a distinction is being made or if the traits are being treated as synonymous). Not a comment on the article as much as a comment on the preconceptions of the commenter, and therefore not constructive.

Respect makes you fatter

edit

Fat Americans do not uderstand ancient Greek. We help them live by using english subtle jargon. Bariatrics (also know as fat-ass medicine) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.84.206.119 (talk) 06:46, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ssjkriccolo's comment

edit

has anyone tried using bariatric ways to loose weight

I know there has been recent reports of problems with it: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20051018.wsurg1018/BNStory/specialScienceandHealth/ Ssjkriccolo 18:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sure, like any surgical procedure biariatric procedures have their share of side-effects. It is therefore not recommended for people with only mild obesity. See it as a trade-off. JFW | T@lk 20:17, 6 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Merge?

edit

As it's currently written, this article is mostly about obesity surgery specifically, rather than the discipline of bariatrics in general. As such, I propose merging the two articles, at least until an article about the medical field of bariatrics in general can be written. Angr/talk 07:42, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good to me. FreplySpang (talk) 05:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Concur Since the subject of bariatrics involves more than surgery, though, I suggest making the surgery article a subsection of this one, at least for now. --Joe Sewell 16:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Classification

edit

Is there any other treatment in Bariatrics besides the surgery?

Formally, medical treatments (with orlistat, sibutramine etc) would also fall under bariatrics, but in practice it refers exclusively to surgical approaches. JFW | T@lk 17:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Maybe the bariatrics article needs to be shrunken to a more general discussion of obesity medicine, but surely I think the current content resorts under bariatric surgery.--Steven Fruitsmaak 18:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Comment on merger

edit

I merged the articles. Because I got fed up at the end, you will notice the part about the operations is schematic, has no citations, and does not say more than the basics, copying parts from the respective individual articles here and there. Feel free to ameliorate.--Steven Fruitsmaak 19:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Proposal to merge from Medical weight loss

edit

It has been proposed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Medical weight loss that some content be merged to this article. Wronkiew (talk) 07:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

non-surgical bariatric medicine

edit

This article only treats topic of bariatric surgery while dismissing the reality of non-surgical batriatric medicine in its own right. In practice, surgeons will often refer prospective patients to lose excess weight prior to surgery. The American Society of Bariatric Physicians (asbp.org) is a leading source of information on the field and practice of non-surgical bariatric medicine. 184.75.100.48 (talk) 20:49, 8 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bariatrics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of Obesity medicine with Bariatrics

edit

The stated (and cited) definition of bariatrics is "the branch of medicine that deals with the causes, prevention, and treatment of obesity". This would seem to be identical to the scope of obesity medicine. (t · c) buidhe 20:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I think obesity medicine is strictly non-surgical, where bariatric physicians are surgeons?--Esprit15d • talkcontribs 22:12, 15 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
If that's true, then both articles are wrong. I'm inclined to merge them, though I only spent a couple of minutes searching (and mostly not finding) sources to guide this decision. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
We could restructure, with Bariatrics as an over-arching article, linking to both the medical (Obesity medicine) and surgical (Bariatric surgery) articles. Klbrain (talk) 19:45, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Closing, given the uncontested counterproposal; scope changed in the lede. Klbrain (talk) 19:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)Reply