 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article has a basic error that is decisive for the whole decision: the claimants had also worked on a self-employed basis, and thus there was a probability that they themselves had caused their sickness! Thus, there is a decisive difference between Barker v. Corus and Fairchild. The article therefore needs to be amended, with regard both to the facts of the case as well as to the conclusion, which is materially wrong. C. Kruse
Start a discussion about improving the Barker v Corus (UK) plc page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Barker v Corus (UK) plc" page.
