This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Leigh (or rather his source) is off the mark in both cases. The existence of Stephen de Burghersh is attested, and so the peerage of 1303 cannot have been extinct, only dormant. As for the 1330 creations, the attainder can't be ignored: Richard could have inherited nothing from his attainted father, and was never Baron Burghersh. Since the barony was never held again after 1409, unless we start explicitly tracking the heirs of peerages under attainder, etc., I'm going to roll back the changes. Choess23:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
