Talk:Baron Darcy de Darcy

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Baron Darcy de Darcy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120111124418/http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk:80/online/content/DarcyD1509.htm to http://www.cracroftspeerage.co.uk/online/content/DarcyD1509.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Dates of Baronies

The Complete Peerage, 2nd edition, volume 4 has separate entries for: -

1. Baron Darcy (of Darcy or of Temple Hurst) - Barony by Writ - 1504 or 1509 to 1537 - attainted.

2. Baron Darcy - Barony in Tail Male - 1548 to 1635 - extinct.

This article appears to treat them as a single barony. Should there be two separate articles? Alekksandr (talk) 14:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)