Talk:Baroque (band)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I do not understand the request to have no heading paragraph and body and reduce this page to a stub. Articles on Wikipedia should have an opening summary, then a detailed body. The three points of contention today: 1. Another editor objects to calling the body "Biography" or "Band History" (perhaps just History as here might be ok. 2. The other question is weather the terms visual kei or oshare kei should be used to describe the band, as it only applies to their indies period. However, I have two sources (in japanese) that describe them this way. The term Oshare Kei was coined to describe this band, and had an influence on many bands that followed, the term is still in use. (English sources that report this are fan sites and can't be used). 3. Should the article be reducded to a stub (as everything is sourced) or stay fleshed out as an article, which is preferable? I argue that a fleshed out, sourced article, is the goal. Denaar 12:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Baroque (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080616173324/http://www.bounce.com/article/article.php/3419/2/ to http://www.bounce.com/article/article.php/3419/2/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927234642/http://www.visunavi.com/artist/preview.php?id=59 to http://www.visunavi.com/artist/preview.php?id=59
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928045105/http://www.pigmy.jp/news/kaisanosirase.html to http://www.pigmy.jp/news/kaisanosirase.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928045059/http://www.pigmy.jp/news/memberkaisan.html to http://www.pigmy.jp/news/memberkaisan.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)