Talk:Barracuda-M

Military history: Aviation / Technology / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Military history. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Land or ship-targeting?

Latest comment: 8 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I am a bit confused. The infobox lists this as a land-attack missile, but the article text mixes comparisons of this missile to land attack (tomahawk) and ship-targeting (LRASM). IMO, this needs clarification, including if it can target both classes. Dbsseven (talk) 13:45, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

The comparisons to LRASM and Tomahawk are in regards to cost and production speed, not their targeting capabilities. Barracuda-M, the Tomahawk family, and LRASM are all capable of both land-attack and anti-ship missions. The article doesn't appear particularly confusing in this regard. ⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 17:53, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Based on this, updating the infobox to something more generic. Dbsseven (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply