Talk:Barry Mehler

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Writethisway in topic Lede needs tightening

Section "Committee to Free Russell Smith"

edit

I gutted the section Barry Mehler#Committee to Free Russell Smith due to WP:NPOV, lack of good references, and, assuming the people mentioned are still alive, WP:BLP issues. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barry Mehler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Controversial "Welcome Video" section

edit

I added a short writeup of the now famous Deadwood quoting f-bomb filled video. I hope the video link stays alive a while, it's fun. TAPwiki (talk) 17:15, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Lede needs tightening

edit

The lede needs some tightening. I already removed an unsourced sentence in the lede. Not only was it unsourced, but it wasn't specifically summarizing a point made in another section of the BLP. WP:LEDE, WP:BLPWritethisway (talk) 23:36, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply