Talk:Bart (magazine)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Jump Guru in topic Manga series

Bart image

edit

I found a image, the best I could find. : ) Also the link has a interview with the creator, which could be ued for a source. – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 05:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability needs to be established (and it taken beyond a stub) before a non-free image should be added. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:48, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, that's okay. On that same website, it has a interview with the creator, which could be used to source. :D – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 15:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deletion

edit

How is this up for deletion? It's better sourced than Banzai! and has third party sources. – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 16:21, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Huh? It isn't up for deletion. It is tagged for notability issues. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:31, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Ooops!....it said it might be deleted, so I thought it was up for deletion, which makes no sence.... How's this not notable? is there a certain problem? – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 16:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not all magazines are notable. We don't have very much information on it to establish that it is notable, such as circulation numbers, reception info, etc. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Reception? I'll see if I can find that on the interview. – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 16:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Keep in mind that the single interview does not satisfy the basic requirement of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing

edit

You erased alot of reliable sources, uhhhh....why? – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 17:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Because they were not valid and did not help support anything in the article. The pages had almost nothing on them. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bart 3230

edit

I think we should make a separate section for Bart 3230. Reason? I noticed the article seems smaller now, which is because the information for 3230 was overflowing the page. – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 17:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Right now, it doesn't need any sections at all. There should only be sections if there is more to say than two sentences, which right now there isn't.-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's seven sentences, not two. :P (kidding!) I'm in no rush. – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 17:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
I meant specifically about 3220 :P -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh, well okay then... I also added a magazine infobox to the page. – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 18:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Manga series

edit

I made a short sentence for The First President of Japan, it should definatly be noted. But the question is...what about the other series? There was only two series in the magazine, so might as well. – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 02:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

What is the English title of the second series (if there is one)? And source for both series being in the magazine? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:01, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
It says it was in Bart in the North Star Pictures website, the other series (only in Japan) I don't think we can get a source, my bad! :P And there's alot of sources for The First President of Japan in North America, in fact, I have a volume, which says it was in Bart too. If you are trying to find it in a bookstore or whatever, it's by a defunct publisher. – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 16:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply