Wikipedia

Talk:Bartow, Florida

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
Former good article nomineeBartow, Florida was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 19, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
January 21, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

WPFL Assessment

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Needs references. Close to B-class, but totally unreferenced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Horologium (talk • contribs) 00:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not so Notable Folks

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Removed this reference that was located on the notable persons list. Not sure that winning an award from Public Storage makes you eligible for this list:

Established

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In order to try to make the article more accurate, I changed the "established" fields in the infobox. I have a bad feeling about it being a mistake. Us441(talk)(contribs) 00:51, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago14 comments4 people in discussion
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Bartow, Florida/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I love this article. Just fix a few references like 121 (retrieval date missing) and I would be very, very happy with this article. I'll let Us441 review it. TeacherA (talk) 00:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Review abandoned. Us441(talk)(contribs) 00:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

OK, I shall take this review over. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Linkrot: 8 dead links repaired and three tagged. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC) I shall conclude this review on 14 January. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    thousands of acres of land around the city were purchased by the phosphate industry and Bartow would become the hub of the largest phosphate industry in the United States. Could do without the repetition of "phosphate industry", consider rephrasing.   Not done
    ''Regardless, the climate pattern prevalent throughout central Florida is evident in Bartow: Rephrase - regardless of what?
    All of Bartow's local representation in the state and federal legislatures are members of the Republican Party. "representation" is a singular word, "are" is a verb form pertaining to plural nouns.  Not done
    On the 2000 Census "On"?
    Although separation concerns over matters of church and state deter the city from directly involved in its operation, the service center has been renting a building from the city for $1 per year since 1966. Missing verb in "deter the city from directly involved in its operation"  Not done
    Bartow has an unusually large number of government jobs. 2unusually" is a weasel word here unless attributed to someone.  Not done
    The largest employer in the phosphate industry is Mosaic which employees over 3,000 people in the area.[ Did you mean "employs"?  Not done
    There are also a couple of Muslim mosques "a couple of" is sloppy, do you mean "two"?  Not done
    I made a number of minor copy-edits but I think you need to go through the article line by line, reading it out aloud to improve the narrative flow and style.
    The lead could do with slight expansion to include culture, recreation and religion. Please see WP:LEAD.  Not done
    Fixed prose issues above... will address WP:LEAD issue shortly. VictorianMutant(Talk) 20:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    Polk County is part of the Bone Valley which is the richest source of phosphate rock in the world; needs a citation for this claim.
    citation added.VictorianMutant(Talk) 20:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    What makes indo.com a reliable source for distances? used at least six times.
    I originally used google, but there was a discussion on the peer review about using distances obtained from goggle (and other map sites). Indo.com obtains its distances using information obtained by the USGS (see here ) and includes the source code used in obtaining that distance. VictorianMutant(Talk) 20:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    OK, I'll buy that. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    Four dead link remain, ref #1[1], ref #2[2], ref #34[3], ref #132[4]
    Other live online sources appear reliable and support the stated facts.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Although there is mention of sports playing fields in the parks section there is no coverage of sports (apart from a passing mention of the Tour or Tow) which should be there according to WP:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline. Notable people and sister cities are also suggested.  Not done
    The Old Polk County Courthouse, Bartow's most recognizable symbol seen on its city seal, was built in 1909 in a neoclassical style Mention of its modern use as a museum should be made, with a brief summary of what type of museum.  Not done
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Fine
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    OK
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    All check out.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    I gave a one week extension, but there are still outstanding issues so i shall not be listing this artcile at this time. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    I have had some health issues which have kept me from being active here, so I am requesting another week to fix the issues(with the article not me). Just realized someone was reviewing this today and my internet access is spotty right now. Thanks VictorianMutant(Talk) 20:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
    OK, on hold until 27 January. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:32, 21 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on Bartow, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bartow, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 25 external links on Bartow, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bartow,_Florida&oldid=1199569960"