Talk:Bascom affair

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Stvangel in topic Needs some work

This article needs editing, it is very interesting, but repeats itself and has contradictions in it.

after reading the Article I choose to read one of the external links and read on Militaryhistory..., but they tell a different Story: here in Wikipedia the Raid happend on Jan. 27, 1861, in Militaryhistory it occured in Oct. 1860 and some months "nothing happend in this case". Here the kidnapped Son is called Felix Ward; on Militaryhistory the Boy is called Mickey Free... etc.. this both Websites tell a different story about the same thing as far as I understand all this. Please forgive me my bad english, I hope I could express what I mean. -- Hartmann Schedel cheers 17:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bascom Affair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Needs some work

edit

Greetings. There were questions above about differing historical versions in different sources. My initial primary issue was the opening paragraph discussing Cochise without mentioning who or what he was. That, and a link, doesn't come up until two sections below. When reading other sources about the issue and the discrepencies, I decided I didn't feel qualified to edit this topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stvangel (talkcontribs) 20:47, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply