Talk:Baselard

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Switzerland Low‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

In Levine, Bernard and Weland, Gerald. Knives, Swords, & Daggers. Barnes & Noble: New York. pg. 100, it states that the swiss dagger is often confused with the schwizerdegen (which is a longer, Swiss short sword), but is not actually the same thing. Does anyone know more about this?Uroscion (talk) 16:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Furthermore, on page 105 it says that the Baselard is considered a forerunner to the Swiss dagger, indicating that they are considered separate weapons.Uroscion (talk) 16:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Earliest record of the name?

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I spent ages looking for early occurrences of this name. This is highly non-trivial as there are literally dozens of ways to spell it.

Now for a long time, the earliest attestations I found were firmly within the 1340s (the 1341 one from Nuremberg being the earliest, but from the same decade also French badelare, leaving a rather short window for the supposed corruption from bas- to bad-.

But now I find the 'Mainzer Friedgebot' of 1300 with its beseler.

wel man zu Meinze inne woninde ist, der rutinge dregit odir swert odir beseler, der sal uz Meinze varin ein vierteil iaris

"whichever man has residence within the city of Mainz, and carries a ruting(?swordstick), or a sword, or a beseler, he shall be banished from Mainz for a quarter-year."

now the 1300 edition has beseler, amended to baseler in the 1335 version.[1]

This seems to substantiate the hypothesis that the German name is primary, as it leaves a window of 40 years for the term to enter French usage, and be corrupted to baselard, badelare. But it makes the association of teh German term with Basel less evident, as the earliest known form is now beseler. --dab (𒁳) 12:00, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Why is the yataghan reference in here? Apart from the single reference in an obscure work, it's not precisely relevant to a middle ages dagger used by the Swiss. Theblindsage (talk) 04:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

size

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Probably a description of the size of these things is a good idea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.76.196.150 (talk) 13:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic