Talk:Basilic vein

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Basilic vein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060420232848/http://www.frca.co.uk:80/images/cannulation2.gif to http://www.frca.co.uk/images/cannulation2.gif

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

"Virgin Vein"

What is the source for this claim? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddhelmet (talk • contribs) 16:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC) Ddhelmet (talk) 16:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

I do not recall the original literature source where I read that the basilic vein is nicknamed the "virgin vein" for the reason I indicated in my write-up. But these references are common, e.g., https://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=4;spage=411;epage=414;aulast=Baliga Also, as an EMT I have heard many IV nurses refer to the basilic vein as such, but can Wikipedia articles be referenced "Personal Communication" or does this violate the editorial preference for secondary sources?--Erasistratus1 (talk) 08:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)