Talk:Basiliscus (lizard)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Issues

edit

1) There appear to be more species of basilisk than this. This page gives also Green Basilisk , Plumed Basilisk, Double-Crested Basilisk= Basiliscus plumifrons, the Brown or Striped Basilisk = Basiliscus vittatus, the Western or Red-Headed Basilisk = Basiliscus galeritus. Anyone

2) Does anyone know if all the basilisks can run on water, and if not which ones? Our information seems confused at this point. DJ Clayworth 19:40, 14 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

3)What about mating? how do they have babies? - rissa

4) If these lizards can run on water for only 15 feet before sinking, then "Simon Peter lizards" would seem a more appropriate name than "Jesus lizards"! - see Matthew 14. 30. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hevelepter (talkcontribs) 09:55, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

5)The first paragraph describes a chimera (goat, lion, snake composite), not a basilisk. You guys should fix that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.42.179.82 (talk) 16:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Running on Water

edit

What does 'hang time mean' in this context ? If someone could remove 'hang time' and replace it with something more understandable, it would improve the article no end. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahpook (talkcontribs) 14:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Description section

edit

The article claims: The basilisk has blue spots and a yellow iris, on average measures 70 to 75 mm (2.8–3.0 in), and weighs about 80 grams (3.2 oz). Its growth is perpetual, fast when they are young and nonlinear for mature basilisks. Its long crest-like sails, reinforced in three distinct points (head, back, and tail), confer the impression of creatures such as Dimetrodon and Edaphosaurus. Its skin is shed in pieces.

This is not true. A basilisk is not 70-75 mm long on average, and that length does not correlate with the 80 grams weight stated at all. Perhaps that measurement refer to head and body length, rather than total length, but the article does not say so; an unspecified length must naturally be the length of the entire animal, including the long tail. Even in that case, it's still wrong. A quick look at the pages for the specific species shows that the statement about size here is wrong. 176.23.118.65 (talk) 11:05, 28 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Basiliscus (genus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply