Talk:Batanes

Latest comment: 9 months ago by Austronesier in topic Fact check William Dampier

WikiProject Philippine LGUs

edit

Wondering how to edit the article? The WikiProject Philippine LGUs could be of help. :)


Earthquake

edit

I add the quake news today.

--Juanatoledo 09:02, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Batanes Islands

edit

User:seav claims that there is no such thing as Batanes Islands. [1].

On the other hand there is a whole category named Category:Batanes Islands.

And User:RioHondo tries to remove the Category:Islands of Batanes in favor of Category:Batanes Islands.

This is one more inconsistency in the Philippine geography content in the English Wikipedia.

Androoox (talk) 21:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

You are really fond of not comprehending things? I said, there is no such thing as "Batanes Island" (singular). There is however such a thing called "Batanes Islands" (plural) and this is synonymous with the province of Batanes. —seav (talk) 23:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
I was gonna move that category to Islands of Batanes the natural way like I did for cat:Visayan Islands, but you already created the destination. Haven't figured how to speedy delete destination category and speedy move at the same time, so i thought of emptying it first and wait for the bots to delete it. So okay, just to get this issue over with, i manually transferred the island articles to the cat you created, and emptied that one instead. --RioHondo (talk) 03:10, 5 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Taipei Times challenging Philippine's claims to the Batanes

edit

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2007/12/23/2003393815

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2013/05/25/2003563102

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/editorials/archives/2004/09/23/2003204030

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Batanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Batanes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:00, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Fact check William Dampier

edit

Mentions ‘Slaver William Dampier’ - do they mean ‘pirate’ or do they refer to Henry Dampier (the slave trader)? 2A02:C7F:1243:A800:89A9:7D16:E6A2:A91D (talk) 19:39, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Some of the facts about William Dampier are wrong. The original source of the information presented is Dampier's own book, but the reference is a secondary source.
1. His party were privateers, not "freebooters". To wit, he only described attacking Spanish shipping and colonies, which was lawful, since England and Spain were at war, and he was commissioned by the English government to do so.
2. He was not the head of the expedition.
3. He was not the captain of the ship he was on.
4. Nowhere in his book does he mention "claiming lands" for England. That was not the purpose of the voyage.(see 1.) Armadillo Ocean (talk) 19:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Read WP:SECONDARY and especially WP:HISTRS. We don't build history-related content based on primary sources. But the secondary source is admittedly not correctly paraphrased. I have thrown out all details not supported by Bellwood and Dizon, and added more ethnographic information (Bellwood and Dizon's actual topic). –Austronesier (talk) 20:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply