Talk:Batang Kali massacre

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Kevink707 in topic Background?

POV

edit

I've removed the following sentence from the original article:

Till today the British government has not made any official unreserved apology to the victims and family members that has been mistreated during the massacre.

I find this unecessarily POV, but I think we can reincorporate it into the document if we can answer the following issues:

Firstly your statement above is also not written from a neutral point of view. Perhaps the sentence above wasn't written well. Take a look at the following documents.

It is impossible to put the link on WP since it triggers the spam filtration. Diagramma Della Verita (talk) 16:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Petitiononline is not link worthy for a good reason, since they're hardly notable. The Star article is better, why don't you cite that properly in the article? Annie D (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

edit

I've just made some edits for style and tense. I tried not to change meaning. I also started tagging unsourced comments but there is a lot things so I didn't want to cover the article in tags. Can any one produce some sources? reports on investigation in 1949 or newspaper articles to firm up this article? Grible (talk) 21:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Opinion

edit

Seeing as there are still no sources for most of the articles content and any new edits seem to take the form of a list of fairly inflammatory or at least POV statements I'm going to risk my neck and tag the article for neutrality. Grible (talk) 20:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Background?

edit

It would be nice to see some background about what lead to this incident. Kevink707 (talk) 02:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply