Talk:Batman: Gotham Knights

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

merge?

edit

As This series and The New Batman Adventures are indeed the same series, The pages should be combined to prevent confusion.

=="The New Batman Adventures" is the proper, official name of the series (see various posts by producer Bruce Timm at the message boards at www.toonzone.net). Based on the comparative quality of the entries, I would copy the animated series content from this entry over to the existing "The New Batman Adventures" entry (replacing the current text) and focus this entry on the "Batman:Gotham Knights" comic book, which is unrelated to the DC Animated Universe.

Merge the two now!

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Batman: Gotham Knights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply