Talk:Battle of Arnhem/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Not reviewed yet - working on it DB 103245 ^talk 18:01, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Fixed a couple of minor issues but on the whole, well written

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   seems to cover everything

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images tagged as free to use

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   All looks fine to me - well done!