This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Baltim article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
It is requested that an image or photograph of Battle of Baltim be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in the following regions may be able to help:
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
How is it that the Osas are slower? They have a top speed of 40 knots while the Sa'ar 4 has a top speed of only 33 knots. Since the Sa'ar 4s achieved most of the kills, I am at loss how they catched up with the Osas. Sherif9282 (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
I don't know. According to this source on Osa article, their speed is 35 knots, which is pretty similar. Asides from that, the source doesn't specify the speed of the chase. Anyway, I got the page number wrong, so I'll fix that. -- Nudve (talk) 14:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)Reply