Talk:Battle of Blair Mountain

Latest comment: 11 months ago by Shearonink in topic Featured article?

Gatling gun

edit

The dedicated article mentions this battle as one at which the weapon was used, but the article here has no mention of it. It's worth a mention. Arminden (talk) 15:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ah, you meant Gatling gun? Yeah Gatlings were used, unclear from my research today exactly where/when/who...the one source - Socialist World Wide I think? - in the Gatling article is probably not completely reliable but multiple references & sources do mention Gatlings being used in some capacity (one was apparently looted from a company store and used by miners - Mining companies had Gatlings on-site!) and also mention machine guns being used. I'll get on this within the next day or two and add additional content concerning machine guns/Gatlings. Shearonink (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The article now contains this statement in the “Battle” section: “Gatling guns and machine guns were employed by both sides, along with additional firepower.[1][2]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeff in CA (talkcontribs) 22:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
  1. ^ Andrews, Evan (September 1, 2018). "The Battle of Blair Mountain". A&E Networks. Retrieved November 1, 2023. ... the battle was renewed on September 1. That morning, a detachment of union men assaulted a spot called Craddock Fork with a Gatling gun looted from a coal company store. Logan forces fought back with a machine gun, but after three hours of heavy fire, their weapon jammed. The miners surged forward and briefly broke the defensive line, only to be repulsed by a fusillade of bullets from a second machine gun nest located further up the ridge.
  2. ^ "The Battle of Blair Mountain". National Park Service. Retrieved November 1, 2023. the two sides battled with gatling guns, rifles, and other firearms along the ridge of Blair Mountain.
Sorry, I meant to update this talk page - Thanks to Jeff in CA for doing so. Shearonink (talk) 22:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Is this article good to be nominated as a featured article? 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:A92C:DB9E:C3C2:C86D (talk) 17:57, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

In my opinion, No. It should probably go through the Good Article process first. Shearonink (talk) 18:10, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply